Transit Times, vol. 30, no. 3, July 2016
PAGE 1
Next Meetings
Tuesday, July 12, 7:30-9pm
Speaker Program: McLean Quinn, VP of EYA
for land acquisition and development, on “What
Makes it Hard to Build Housing Near Transit?”
Tuesday, August 9, 7:30-9pm
Speaker Program TBD
Tuesday, September 13, 7:30-9pm
Speaker Program TBD
ACT’s monthly meetings are held the second
Tuesday of each month, at the Silver Spring Civic
Center, One Veterans Place. Meetings begin at
7:30pm. The Silver Spring Civic Center faces the
Fenton Street and Ellsworth Avenue. It is an eight-
minute walk north from the Silver Spring Metro
Station. Many bus routes can take you to and from
the meeting. Ride-On #15 and #19 stop at the cor-
ner of Wayne Ave. & Fenton St.; Metrobus routes
Z6 and Z8 and Ride-On routes #9 and #12 stop
along Colesville Road; Ride-On #16, #17, and #20
pass by on Fenton St. If coming by car, plentiful
evening parking is available at the Wayne Avenue
garage and is (despite ACT’s advocacy against
subsidies for drivers) free after 7 pm.
The newsletter of the Action Committee for Transit of Montgomery County, Maryland.
Inside This Issue
MD Public Works Approves Purple Line 2
On Aprl 6, the State of Maryland’s Board of Pub-
lic Works approved a $5.6 billion contract for a
public-private partnership
President’s Letter 2
The last few months have been anything but dull
for transit activists in this area.
Reflections on the Purple Line 3
Bipartisanship helped the Purple Line campaign
as the project won the support of the business
community and of Gov. Hogan.
Rockville Comprehensive Master Plan 4
Competing visions for growth have significantly
impacted development in Rockville over the last
10 years.
“Transit Maps of the World,” 3rd Edition 5
The only comprehensive collection of urban rail
transit (i.e., elevated, subway, light rail, and street-
car) maps was compiled by British author Mark
Ovenden into a book
Transit Times
Join us in working for more and better transit. Whether you want to help us leaflet at Metro and MARC
stations, work for pedestrian and bicycle safety or testify at public hearings, or volunteer in some other
way—we would love to work with you. Contact ACT Staff at admin@actfortransit.org.
If you have not yet renewed your ACT membership, please do so now. When you renew your member-
ship for our special 30th anniversary year, please consider increasing your donation to $30, $60, $90 or
$300—in commemoration of this milestone year.
We Need YOU!
Transit Times, vol. 30, no. 3, July 2016
PAGE 2
The last few months have been anything but dull
for transit activists in this area.
The Maryland Board of Public Works approved
the Purple Line’s contract in early April, marking
another milestone as we get closer and closer to
construction. In the meantime, preliminary utility
work for the Purple Line has begun in downtown
Bethesda.
Years of deferred maintenance and repairs are be-
ing dealt with by WMATAs “Safetrack” mainte-
nance surges. It goes without saying that Metrorail
is key to keeping this area moving. ACT, as well
as many other transit groups, have called on area
departments of transportation to create bus-only
lanes. ACT has specifically urged bus-only lanes
on major arteries and on Metros “bus bridges” to
allow the region’s commuters to make it through
this difficult time. To date, the region’s depart-
ments of transportation have yet to take substan-
tive action. We will continue to press them.
Our Vision Zero campaign for pedestrian and
bicycle safety has continued with two very inter-
esting events. The first took place in a community
center on Route 198 in Burtonsville, a state route
with no sidewalks and where children must be
bused to the nearby elementary school - all of 0.6
mile away from their home.
The next event took place in the Long Branch
neighborhood of Takoma Park. ACT volunteers,
joined by Montgomery County Planning Board
Member Natali Fani-Gonzalez, spoke to area
residents crossing at Flower Avenue and Piney
Branch Road about how that intersection could be
safer and more comfortable for pedestrians. Jour-
nalists from Telemundo and Channel 7 News were
there to see our folks in action.
ACT’s event in Takoma Park took on particular
significance because, just three days before, a
Gaithersburg high school student had been killed
on Route 355. Santos Escobar-Villatoro had been
riding his bicycle on the sidewalk. His bike hit
an advertising sign and he was thrown into the
road and struck by a car. All it would have taken
to prevent his death was a four-foot (grass) buffer
between the sidewalk and the road.
Preventing this sort of needless death by simple
changes in road design is exactly what Vision
Zero is all about.
Sincerely,
Ronit Aviva Dancis
President’s Letter
On April 6, the State of Maryland’s Board of
Public Works approved a $5.6 billion contract for
a public-private partnership (P3) to design, build,
operate, and maintain (DBOM) the 16.2-mile
Purple Line light rail project between Bethesda
and New Carrollton. The Board of Public Works
— comprised of Gov. Larry Hogan (R), State
Treasurer Nancy K. Kopp (D) and Comptroller
Peter Franchot (D) — unanimously approved the
36-year contract after 40 minutes of discussion.
The contract consisted of 876 pages and is be-
lieved to be the most expensive contract that the
State of Maryland has ever signed. The public-
private partnership is one of the largest in the U.S.
for transportation. The approval by the Board of
Public Works is the last Maryland state-required
action before the Federal government takes action.
Approval of the contract for the Purple Line
signifies that the Maryland State Department of
Transportation (MDOT) can now finalize a Full
Funding Grant Agreement with the Federal Tran-
sit Administration (FTA). The FFGA is for $900
million in “New Starts” funds. The FFGA, which
is expected in mid-July, is almost assured, as the
FTA has already recommended the funding. It
would be the final hurdle before construction can
begin. The contract is expected to reach financial
close by June 2. It has attracted national attention
because it makes the Purple Line one of the first
U.S. transit projects to include private financing.
Maryland Board of Public
Works Approves Purple Line
by Quon Kwan
Transit Times, vol. 30, no. 3, July 2016
PAGE 3
The DBOM P3 contractor selected from the four
semi-finalists for the Purple Line project is Purple
Line Transit Partners, which is led by Texas-based
Fluor Corp., the French investment firm, Me-
ridiam, and Star America, a New York firm, which
invests in public infrastructure projects. All three
firms specialize in public-private partnerships.
Among the projects in which the three firms have
been involved are as follows: Fluor Corp. was
the managing partner on building the $3.3 billion
electric commuter rail project between Denvers
Union Station and Denver International Airport
(also a P3 project) as well as a partner in build-
ing the $1 billion Exposition light rail line Phase
1 in Los Angeles. Meridiam worked under a $903
million contract for a tunnel at the Port of Miami.
Star America was involved in a $430 million by-
pass around Portsmouth, Ohio.
After the Board of Public works approval, MDOT
on the same day granted Purple Line Transit Part-
ners “limited notice to proceed.” This allows $12
million of pre-construction work, such as, comple-
tion of the design and execution of both survey
work and soil borings. Full notice to proceed with
construction will be granted after the FFGA is
signed. Ground-breaking for the Purple Line is
scheduled to begin in November or December this
year, which will start in Prince George’s County
with re-location of utility, water, and sewer lines.
Trains are expected to begin by spring 2022 op-
erating in revenue service along the entire line at
one time rather than phased-in segments staggered
over time.
Reflections on the Purple Line,
its National Importance, and
our Retiring Senator
by Ross Capon
“Of the new FFGA [Full Funding Grant Agree-
ment] projects in the [President’s] budget request,
the Committee recommendation includes not less
than … $125 million for the project in Maryland
...” ~ Senate Appropriations Committee’s report
on its FY 2017 transportation/housing bill
The quote above is another indication that the
16.2-mile Purple Line is on the road to reality.
Thirty years ago, who knew that a seeming “no-
brainer” like repurposing the B&O’s Bethesda-
Silver Spring line would take so long. Fortunately,
expansion of the plan to include Prince George’s
County—a form of “make no small plans”—
helped grow support to the necessary critical
mass.
The tenaciousness of the Appropriations Com-
mittee’s top Democrat, retiring Barbara Mikulski
(D-MD), bodes well for inclusion of that money
when 2017 funding is finally enacted. Sen. Rich-
ard Shelby (R-AL), who has traded chairmanship
and ranking member roles with Mikulski over the
years put it this way: “I don’t believe anybody
up here is more effective than Barbara Mikulski.
I hope the people of Maryland understand that.
I’ve enjoyed working with Barbara because if you
don’t work with her she’ll fight you.” It is possible
that Mikulski’s fierce support for Amtrak over the
years helps explain why Shelby has moderated his
antipathy to the railroad.
Maryland’s senior senator got a bipartisan, stand-
ing ovation at the April 21 committee session
where—for the last time with Mikulski as a mem-
ber—the Committee passed transportation/hous-
ing and commerce/justice/science spending bills.
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) gave a warm
tribute to Mikulski’s work which Shelby heart-
ily endorsed. Mikulski spoke of her early Senate
years when I had a “great Republican chairman
[Jake Garn (UT)], an astronaut senator who taught
me that friendship leads to bipartisanship.”
Bipartisanship helped the Purple Line campaign
as the project won the support of the business
community and of Gov. Hogan. Now, the key role
played by the private sector is helping to broaden
support for the project, especially among Republi-
cans. This also gives our Purple Line national sig-
nificance as only the second transit public-private
partnership. Serendipitously, the first such proj-
ect—rail transit linking Denver to its airport—just
began revenue service on April 22.
Transit Times, vol. 30, no. 3, July 2016
PAGE 4
The Rockville Comprehensive
Master Plan: Common Ground
Despite Competing Visions?
By Jennifer Hosey
For those who have followed politics in this
mid-county municipality, growth issues have
dominated city elections. Competing visions for
growth have significantly impacted development
in Rockville over the last 10 years. However, it is
invigorating to recognize critical areas of common
ground on transit and walkability.
While there is competing sentiment as to whether
walkability should be part of a pro-growth urban-
ist vision or whether walkability should be part
of a low growth suburbanist vision, community
leaders universally voiced that walkability on
Route 355 should be a priority in the new Com-
prehensive Master Plan. There was also near uni-
versal support for a circulator, a dedicated funding
source for WMATA, etc. I suppose it is the politi-
cian in me that gets excited by unexpected allies,
even if those allies support only a few projects in
common rather than an entire citywide vision.
In recent years, most controversial was an effec-
tive moratorium on new residential development
using the Adequate Public Facility Standards
(APFS) for schools. It was enacted in 2005 and
loosened in 2015. Nevertheless, community
leaders on both sides of that issue form a natural
consensus on certain aspects of transit and walk-
ability.
Independent of my role as an ACT board member,
I have been participating in Rockville’s Compre-
hensive Master Plan community forums as a mil-
lennial homeowner/resident enjoying urban life in
the Rockville Town Center. Community leaders at
the Comprehensive Master Plan forums have been
exchanging ideas on designing the city’s future
for the year 2040. Breakout groups cover different
elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan and
of course, I chose transportation. In the breakout
group, both city planners and community leaders
with different viewpoints engaged in a vigorous
yet constructive dialectic.
There was universal agreement on the need for
buffer zones on Rockville Pike (Maryland Route
355) by both pro-growth and anti-growth partici-
pants. We agreed that it feels so dangerous, that
most people would rather drive than walk just
a couple of blocks. Four feet of buffer protects
pedestrians and bicyclists on the sidewalk from
cars that jump curbs, etc. It creates a strategically
walkable environment in terms of actual safety
and in terms of creating a feeling of safety.
A more in depth discussion of buffer zones and
the role it plays in the Vision Zero campaign is
part of the letter by ACT President Ronit Dancis.
Another point of agreement among participants
The American Public Transportation Association’s
April 14 monthly briefing was devoted to Mary-
land Transit Administration Administrator & CEO
Paul Comfort’s explanation of the Purple Line
contract. It provides six years design & construc-
tion and 30 years operation & maintenance. Rev-
enue service begins in spring 2022, and the project
must have a minimum of three years life beyond
the length of the contract. Comfort said the win-
ning team is the same group that did the Denver
rail project, “so we get the same people and the
benefit of lessons learned” in Colorado. See www.
purplelinemd.com/en/p3.
Shannon Hines, Senate Banking Committee ma-
jority staff—in a June 9 Capitol Hill talk to the an-
nual transportation forum of the conservative Free
Congress Foundation—said, “We’re encouraged
by the Purple Line.” Her boss, Richard Shelby (R-
AL) has been pushing transit public-private part-
nerships for years with a view to expedited federal
approval for projects requiring just 25% federal
funding.
Note: If Congress resorts to a continuing resolu-
tion to begin FY 2017, the Purple Line is likely to
get the same amount of federal funding ($100 mil-
lion) as this year. Election results potentially could
reverse that later.
Transit Times, vol. 30, no. 3, July 2016
PAGE 5
with different visions was the proposed Rockville
circulator. Currently, Rockville does not run its
own bus service, but the circulator, envisioned by
planners, would employ medium sized vehicles
that would travel along well designed routes. With
30,000 additional jobs projected for Rockville be-
tween now and 2040, an expansion of transit op-
tions could be a strategic economic development
move. City planners particularly sought our differ-
ent ideas on how to design routes from scratch.
As one possible option, I shared with them the
name of a texting app that can process an unlim-
ited number of public comment texts. During my
Vision Zero meetings, a transportation consultant
at Fehr & Peers mentioned that it had been used in
Pennsylvania to solicit input on how to improve
existing transit by posting the texting number
on buses. It cost very little to use this service.
Nowadays, people from all income levels, even
those with the lowest, have smartphones. The city
planners seemed to like my suggestion that such a
texting app for the public input process be used on
existing Metrobus, RideOn, Metro Stations, bus
shelters, Rockville public buildings, etc. because
people who would be interested in a circulator are
probably already using transit or public services
from the county and region. From their input,
some circulator routes could be designed.
The Rockville Pike tunnel that would allow for
BRT above is a hot topic of discussion. It is an
interesting idea with a variation first proposed in
a 2001 master plan. I live in the Americana in the
high rise closest to the Rockville Metro Station
and the proposed tunnel would run in front of my
building. For the time being, I will refrain from
discussing the proposed tunnel because it could
considerably affect my property value…
“Transit Maps of the World”
by Quon Kwan
The Transit Times issue of January 2009 (vol.
23, no. 1) reported that the first and only com-
prehensive collection of urban rail transit (i.e.,
elevated, subway, light rail, and streetcar) maps
was compiled by British author Mark Ovenden
into a book and published by Penguin Random
House as “Transit Maps of the World.” The book
has been updated and released as the third edition,
published in November 2015. It is now expanded
with 36 more pages, 250 city maps revised from
previous editions, and listings given from almost a
thousand systems.
The book appeared twice in New York Times book
reviews. The first time was in the review pub-
lished on November 23, 2007, written by Wil-
liam Grimes. He writes, “Why should anyone
study, transfixed, the route guide to the Budapest
subway? Perhaps because it distills the romance
of travel to a concentrated essence, a roll call of
distant place names: Porte de Clignancourt, Uh-
landstrasse, Mayakovskaya. In “Algiers” Charles
Boyer looks deep into Hedy Lamarrs eyes and
tells her that she reminds him of the Paris subway.
Were more romantic words ever spoken?”
The second time, the book was alluded to in the
New York Times book review published on March
5, 2010, written by Stephen Heller. This is what
Heller said about the book, “Finally, what makes
a map funny? Let’s cite an example. My favor-
ite is the urban rail map that shows how you can
get from Oslo to Pyongyang “without changing
trains.” (That map, incidentally, served as a pro-
motion piece for Ovenden’s “Transit Maps of the
World.”)
Unfortunately, certain maps in the book are al-
ready out of date, but that is the nature of the pub-
lishing business: Terry Richards, who reviewed
the book in the October 23, 2015 issue of The
Oregonian made three observations: The book’s
map of Portland, Oregon Tri-Met system missed
the September 2015 opening of the Orange line
and the street car extension. Second, the imminent
opening of the Sound Transit light rail stations at
Capitol Hill and the University of Washington in
Seattle did not even get dashed lines, even though
they open in 2016. Third, a surprise in the book is
a 1.2-mile streetcar line in Whitehorse, Yukon Ter-
ritory, Canada.
Transit Times, vol. 30, no. 3, July 2016
PAGE 6
Editorial Remarks
Your Transit Times editor is Quon Kwan. Cutoff
date for receiving materials for the next publication
is September 9. Send your materials to Quon at:
qykwan@gmail.com or call him at: (h) 301-460-7454
ACT Officers/Staff:
President: Ronit Dancis
V. Pres (legislative): Jim Clarke
V. Pres (social media): Sean Emerson
V. Pres (land use & housing shortage): Dan Reed
Secretary: Vaughn Stewart
Treasurer: Nick Brand
Board Member (MARC): Ben Shnider
Board Member: Jennifer Hosey
Non-Voting ex officio board members:
Ralph Bennett: Purple Line Now!
Ben Ross: Programs
Miriam Schoenbaum: Upcounty
Webmaster: Jeri Roth
Staff: Cindy Snow & Kathy Jentz
admin@actfortransit.org / 240-308-1209
Action Committee for Transit, Inc.
P.O. Box 7074, Silver Spring, MD 20907
Transit Times
Action Committee for Transit, Inc.
P.O. Box 7074
Silver Spring, MD 20907
ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED
PRSRT STD
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
SILVER SPRING, MD
PERMIT # 1931
Join/Renew ACT Now
You can join ACT by remitting membership dues. A
second ACT dues renewal notice has recently been
mailed out. Your membership dues are based on the
category of membership that you choose:
$10 [rider]
$25 [activist]
$50 [conductor]
$100 [engineer]
You can join/renew online at our website, or send your
check for the chosen category of membership to:
Action Committee for Transit
P.O. Box 7074
Silver Spring, MD 20907
You may also give your membership dues to Treasurer
Nick Brand at the next ACT meeting. The address on
your check will be used as the mailing address unless
otherwise indicated.
If you have already renewed for 2016, Thank YOU!
Your dues support ACT Activities and this newsletter.
www.actfortransit.org
www.twitter.com/actfortransit
www.facebook.com/actfortransit