I-270 Widening and MARC Expansion in the CLRP
The Honorable Todd Turner, Chair
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board
777 North Capital Street NE, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20002-4239
Dear Chair Turner:
Action Committee for Transit offers the following comments for consideration regarding the draft 2012 Constrained Long Range Plan (CLRP). The I-270 Corridor highway expansion in Maryland, with a completion date of 2030, is listed as costing $3.4 billion. Spending more than three billion dollars on widening I-270 is a not a good idea:
- While widening I-270 will reduce congestion initially, this is not a sustainable solution. Case in point: when I-270 was widened south of Shady Grove, the new lanes quickly filled up and the road was soon just as congested as it was before – except with many more cars.
- Note that just $0.5 billion of the proposed $3.4 billion for highway widening could fund the entire expansion and improvement of the MARC Brunswick line, which travels in the I-270 corridor. The MTA’s MARC Growth and Investment Plan is not currently funded in the CLRP.
- Finally, the I-270 highway construction would preclude extension of the Metro Red Line to Germantown by removing the existing right of way along I-270 in which the extension could be built most cost-effectively. With METRO as the backbone of transit in the metropolitan area, we must not close off future transit options.
A plan drawn up four years ago by Maryland transportation planners, called the MARC Growth and Investment Plan, would vastly improve service on the commuter train line from Washington to Frederick and Brunswick. Trains would run all day in both directions, and in rush hour trains would run every 15 minutes from Union Station through Rockville and Germantown to Point of Rocks. Rush-hour trains would go to Frederick and Brunswick every half hour. Trains would also run mid-day, evenings, and weekends, but less frequently.
The current lull in gas prices is temporary; over the long haul an upward price trend is more likely. The CLRP is a long range plan and future increases in gas prices will destabilize current patterns that make reliance on private automobiles the ubiquitous mode that it is today. Citizens will expect their governments to have forecast these trends and to have made plans for transportation alternatives to the personal automobile. Swapping out some highway projects for more transit can also improve our region’s air quality problem.
The Action Committee for Transit asks that the MARC Growth and Investment Plan be included in the CLRP.
Action Committee for Transit, President